Just in case anyone was wondering the images, words, crap jokes and all the other bits of content on these page remain my copyright. You don't have my permission to copy them or post them anywhere else on the web. This includes you Tango01 you thieving shitweasel.
You'll notice my ethical reservations didn't extend as far as not actually buying or painting them. I'm a sort of weekend social justice warrior I guess. :)
They're excellent sculpts and your brushwork on them is superb, but like you I do have reservations about nudity in general on figures as most times it's not needed, but seems merely self-indulgent on the part of the sculptor. In your collection, for example, why don't they all have feathered lower areas ? Getting off soap-box now
Agreed. I don't know (though I could hazard a guess) why the sculptor felt one of the five shouldn't have the lower anatomy of a bird. (I think there might be a mythological explanation that they at first appear as beautiful women, but still...)
Yeah, unfortunately Armintrout has banned me (for complaining about that twat Tango) so I'm unable to report that twat Tango. However if that twat Tango is enough of a twat to link to a post with a header calling him a thief and then body content pointing out that he's literally a wanker then I guess there's no helping the colossal fucknuckle that goes by the name of Tango01. Or That Cunt Armand (smile).
Hmm, join the queue Tom, get your hands on Josephine!!!
ReplyDeleteI mean off!! Get your hands off I mean!!! Crikey, I'm all of a dither...
DeleteShe told me she likes you, but just as a friend.
DeleteðŸ˜
DeleteThey look great, despite your ethical reservations.
ReplyDeleteYou'll notice my ethical reservations didn't extend as far as not actually buying or painting them.
DeleteI'm a sort of weekend social justice warrior I guess.
:)
They're excellent sculpts and your brushwork on them is superb, but like you I do have reservations about nudity in general on figures as most times it's not needed, but seems merely self-indulgent on the part of the sculptor. In your collection, for example, why don't they all have feathered lower areas ? Getting off soap-box now
ReplyDeleteAgreed. I don't know (though I could hazard a guess) why the sculptor felt one of the five shouldn't have the lower anatomy of a bird. (I think there might be a mythological explanation that they at first appear as beautiful women, but still...)
DeleteYou've been Tangoed. Looks like the dim blog-burglar has ignored your instructions!
ReplyDeletehttp://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=480925
Yeah, unfortunately Armintrout has banned me (for complaining about that twat Tango) so I'm unable to report that twat Tango.
DeleteHowever if that twat Tango is enough of a twat to link to a post with a header calling him a thief and then body content pointing out that he's literally a wanker then I guess there's no helping the colossal fucknuckle that goes by the name of Tango01.
Or That Cunt Armand (smile).
We'll said sir. Like the blog by the way, will be following from now on.
Delete